DHANANJOY DAS versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE & ANR.
Paragraph 1 of the grounds is only an introduction or preamble and cannot be a ground of attack for vagueness; paragraphs 2 and 3 supply sufficient basic facts for effective representation; the facts relate to the maintenance of public order in Assam given the prevailing circumstances and applicable legal standards.
- Parties
- Appellant: Dhananjoy Das; Respondent: District Magistrate; Respondent: State of Assam
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Certificate From High Court Judgment Dismissing Art. 226 Petition
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Article 22(5) Rights of Detenu, National Security Act, 1980, S. 3(3) Detention Grounds, Vagueness of Detention Grounds, Distinction Between Law and Order and Public Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dhananjoy Das
Appellant
District Magistrate
Respondent
State of Assam
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Certificate From High Court Judgment Dismissing Art. 226 Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether paragraph 1 of the grounds of detention is vague and invalidates the detention order
- 2 Whether paragraphs 2 and 3 are vague for lack of details
- 3 Whether the grounds relate to law and order or public order
Ratio Decidendi
Paragraph 1 of the grounds is only an introduction or preamble and cannot be a ground of attack for vagueness; paragraphs 2 and 3 supply sufficient basic facts for effective representation; the facts relate to the maintenance of public order in Assam given the prevailing circumstances and applicable legal standards.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; detention order upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment