THE DHARANGADRA CHEMICAL WORKS versus DHARANGADHRA MUNICIPALITY & ANOTHER
The sanctioned Municipal Octroi Rules and Bye-laws of 1965 were validly made and saved under clause (vi) of section 279(2) of the Gujarat Act; mere repeal of the Bombay Act did not affect their force as they were part and parcel of the saved sanction order; Corrigendum of 10.3.1965 was merely to correct typographical errors and did not amount to modification requiring de novo procedure; thus, the levy at the enhanced octroi rate was valid from 1.5.1965.
- Parties
- Appellant: Dharangadhra Chemical Works; Respondent No.1: Dharangadhra Municipality; Respondent No.2: (Unnamed Respondent No.2)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Gujarat High Court Judgment Dated January 21, 1971 in Special Civil Application No. 786 of 1965
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Octroi Duties, Implied Repeal, Validating Legislation, Rule Making Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dharangadhra Chemical Works
Appellant
Dharangadhra Municipality
Respondent No.1
(Unnamed Respondent No.2)
Respondent No.2
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Gujarat High Court Judgment Dated January 21, 1971 in Special Civil Application No. 786 of 1965
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the enhanced levy of octroi duty by the municipality from 1.5.1965 was valid under the Bombay District Municipalities Act and later under the Gujarat Municipalities Act
- 2 Whether rules and bye-laws sanctioned but not brought into force before repeal of Bombay Act are saved by the Gujarat Act
- 3 Whether corrigendum to octroi rules and bye-laws amounted to invalid modification
Ratio Decidendi
The sanctioned Municipal Octroi Rules and Bye-laws of 1965 were validly made and saved under clause (vi) of section 279(2) of the Gujarat Act; mere repeal of the Bombay Act did not affect their force as they were part and parcel of the saved sanction order; Corrigendum of 10.3.1965 was merely to correct typographical errors and did not amount to modification requiring de novo procedure; thus, the levy at the enhanced octroi rate was valid from 1.5.1965.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- There will be no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment