DHARMIN BAI KASHYAP versus BABLI SAHU & OTHERS

DHARMIN BAI KASHYAP versus BABLI SAHU & OTHERS

Section 122 requires election petitions to be presented in the prescribed manner and Rule 6 specifies the declaratory reliefs that may be claimed; therefore an election petition must claim reliefs in consonance with Rule 6. A petition seeking only recounting of votes, without claiming the declaratory reliefs under Rule 6 and without complying with the written application requirement of Rule 80, is not maintainable.

Parties
Appellant: DHARMIN BAI KASHYAP; Respondent: BABLI SAHU & OTHERS
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
16 August 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 25.04.2022 of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur in WA No.72 of 2022
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Recount of Votes, Election Petition Under Section 122, Rule 6 of Chhattisgarh Panchayats (election Petitions, Corrupt Practices and Disqualification for Membership) Rules, 1995, Rule 80 of Chhattisgarh Panchayat Nirvachan Niyam, Strict Construction of Election Law

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

DHARMIN BAI KASHYAP

Appellant

BABLI SAHU & OTHERS

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 25.04.2022 of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur in WA No.72 of 2022

  1. 1 Whether an election petition filed under Section 122 seeking only recounting of votes without claiming the declaratory reliefs under Rule 6 of the Rules of 1995 is maintainable

Ratio Decidendi

Section 122 requires election petitions to be presented in the prescribed manner and Rule 6 specifies the declaratory reliefs that may be claimed; therefore an election petition must claim reliefs in consonance with Rule 6. A petition seeking only recounting of votes, without claiming the declaratory reliefs under Rule 6 and without complying with the written application requirement of Rule 80, is not maintainable.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.