D.H.B.V.N.L. VIDYUT NAGAR, HISAR & OTHERS versus YASHVIR SINGH GULIA
The competent authority may dispense with a full departmental inquiry, even if major penalty was initially contemplated, and instead impose minor penalty after considering the reply of the delinquent; the procedure as per Regulation 7(8) was correctly followed by the Board.
- Parties
- Appellant: D.H.B.V.N.L. Vidyut Nagar, Hisar & Others; Respondent: Yashvir Singh Gulia
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Departmental Inquiry, Minor Penalties, Major Penalties, Employees' Punishment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D.H.B.V.N.L. Vidyut Nagar, Hisar & Others
Appellant
Yashvir Singh Gulia
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a full-fledged departmental inquiry is obligatory when a major penalty has been contemplated but, after considering the delinquent's reply, a minor penalty is imposed instead
Ratio Decidendi
The competent authority may dispense with a full departmental inquiry, even if major penalty was initially contemplated, and instead impose minor penalty after considering the reply of the delinquent; the procedure as per Regulation 7(8) was correctly followed by the Board.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgments of District Judge and High Court are set aside
- Due promotion to respondent if minor penalty is not a bar
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment