DINESH @ BUDDHA versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 was not applicable because there was no evidence that rape was committed because the victim was a Scheduled Caste member; sentence awarded under that section was set aside. The appropriate sentence under Section 376(2)(f) IPC for rape of a minor below 12 years is not less than 10 years unless special and adequate reasons exist, which were not found. Therefore, sentence reduced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment. Compensation award to the victim stands as State did not challenge it.
- Parties
- Appellant: Dinesh @ Buddha; Respondent: State of Rajasthan
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Judgment by Supreme Court After Appeal From Rajasthan High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with modification of sentence
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Sentencing, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Compensation to Victims, Identity Protection for Victims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dinesh @ Buddha
Appellant
State of Rajasthan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Judgment by Supreme Court After Appeal From Rajasthan High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Applicability of Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 in rape cases
- 2 Appropriate sentencing under Section 376(2)(f) IPC for rape of minor below 12 years
- 3 Legality and quantum of compensation awarded to rape victims
Ratio Decidendi
Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 was not applicable because there was no evidence that rape was committed because the victim was a Scheduled Caste member; sentence awarded under that section was set aside. The appropriate sentence under Section 376(2)(f) IPC for rape of a minor below 12 years is not less than 10 years unless special and adequate reasons exist, which were not found. Therefore, sentence reduced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment. Compensation award to the victim stands as State did not challenge it.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with modification of sentence
Orders
- Sentence reduced from life imprisonment to 10 years rigorous imprisonment
- Fine of Rs.1,000/- to be paid by appellant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment