DIPITIMAYEE PARIDA versus STATE OF ORISSA & ORS.

DIPITIMAYEE PARIDA versus STATE OF ORISSA & ORS.

Qualifications and eligibility for recruitment must be assessed as of the last date for submitting the application. The Selection Committee was not authorized to grant marks for marital status acquired after the cutoff; as the rules did not permit relaxation and the marking stages were fixed, such award was impermissible. Recruitment criteria prescribed by State under Article 162 are binding and must be strictly followed.

Parties
Appellant: Dipitimayee Parida; Respondents: State of Orissa & Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
20 October 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Disposition of Appeal From Division Bench Judgment of High Court of Orissa in Intra Court Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Eligibility Criteria for Appointment, Integrated Child Development Scheme, Recruitment Procedure, Marital Status as Qualification, Marking Scheme for Selection, Jurisdiction Under Article 162
Service Law Eligibility Criteria for Appointment Integrated Child Development Scheme Recruitment Procedure Marital Status as Qualification Marking Scheme for Selection Jurisdiction Under Article 162

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dipitimayee Parida

Appellant

State of Orissa & Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Disposition of Appeal From Division Bench Judgment of High Court of Orissa in Intra Court Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether awarding marks for marital status acquired after last date of application is permissible in recruitment of Anganwadi Worker under Integrated Child Development Scheme
  2. 2 Whether Selection Committee had jurisdiction to allot marks contrary to prescribed criteria

Ratio Decidendi

Qualifications and eligibility for recruitment must be assessed as of the last date for submitting the application. The Selection Committee was not authorized to grant marks for marital status acquired after the cutoff; as the rules did not permit relaxation and the marking stages were fixed, such award was impermissible. Recruitment criteria prescribed by State under Article 162 are binding and must be strictly followed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs
  • Appointment of appellant set aside; respondent No. 5 to be engaged as Anganwadi Worker if no other impediment