D.N. KRISHNAPPA versus THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER
Where an award of reinstatement has been confirmed on appeal and ultimately attained finality, an employee is entitled to full wages and emoluments from the date of the reinstatement order to the date of actual reinstatement, subject only to adjustment of amounts already paid under Section 17B; an interim stay obtained by the employer does not disentitle the employee to such back wages when the award is finally confirmed and the CGIT could enforce the adjudicated award under Section 33-C(2).
- Parties
- Appellant: D.N. Krishnappa; Respondent: The Deputy General Manager
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal No. 9008 of 2022 / Appeal Against Division Bench Judgment of the High Court of Karnataka Dated 30.06.2022 Challenging Order Under Section 33 C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Section 33 C(2), Section 17 B, Reinstatement, Back Wages, Interim Stay, Principle of Merger, Implementation of Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D.N. Krishnappa
Appellant
The Deputy General Manager
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal No. 9008 of 2022 / Appeal Against Division Bench Judgment of the High Court of Karnataka Dated 30.06.2022 Challenging Order Under Section 33 C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether employee is entitled to wages/back wages from date of award of reinstatement (18.07.2007) to actual reinstatement (23.09.2013)
- 2 Whether an interim stay of an award and subsequent final order merges so as to deny wages for the stayed period
- 3 Whether the CGIT had jurisdiction under Section 33-C(2) to enforce the award when the claim was adjudicated
Ratio Decidendi
Where an award of reinstatement has been confirmed on appeal and ultimately attained finality, an employee is entitled to full wages and emoluments from the date of the reinstatement order to the date of actual reinstatement, subject only to adjustment of amounts already paid under Section 17B; an interim stay obtained by the employer does not disentitle the employee to such back wages when the award is finally confirmed and the CGIT could enforce the adjudicated award under Section 33-C(2).
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned judgment and order dated 30.06.2022 of the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka is quashed and set aside
- The appellant is entitled to full wages with all emoluments from 18.07.2007 (date of reinstatement order) to 23.09.2013 (date of actual reinstatement), after adjusting/deducting amounts already paid under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment