DR. KM. SUMAN AGARWAL versus THE VICE CHANCELLOR AND ORS.
Both direct recruits and those appointed by personal promotion as Readers form part of the same cadre for the purposes of seniority, but the promotee is a temporary addition to the cadre. Inter se seniority is determined based on length of continuous service in the cadre of Reader. As the respondent was promoted as Reader by personal promotion before the appellant's direct recruitment, the respondent is senior in the cadre.
- Parties
- Appellant: Dr. Km. Suman Agarwal; Respondents: The Vice Chancellor and Ors.; Third Respondent: Dr. (Mrs.) Hiru Kumar
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From Allahabad High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of
- Legal Topics
- Seniority in University Cadre, Personal Promotion Scheme, Inter Se Seniority, Temporary Addition to Cadre
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr. Km. Suman Agarwal
Appellant
The Vice Chancellor and Ors.
Respondents
Dr. (Mrs.) Hiru Kumar
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From Allahabad High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appointment as Reader under personal promotion forms part of the cadre of Readers
- 2 How inter se seniority between direct and personal promotion appointees is determined under the relevant Act and Statutes
Ratio Decidendi
Both direct recruits and those appointed by personal promotion as Readers form part of the same cadre for the purposes of seniority, but the promotee is a temporary addition to the cadre. Inter se seniority is determined based on length of continuous service in the cadre of Reader. As the respondent was promoted as Reader by personal promotion before the appellant's direct recruitment, the respondent is senior in the cadre.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of
Orders
- Dr. (Mrs.) Hiru Kumar, having been made in-charge Director, shall continue until a regular incumbent takes charge as Director.
- The University is directed to determine and appoint the eligible candidate as a Professor as expeditiously as possible within 6 weeks from the date of receiving this order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment