DR. L.P. AGARWAL versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

DR. L.P. AGARWAL versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

A person holding a tenure post cannot be prematurely retired by invoking the concept of superannuation or compulsory retirement, which does not apply to such appointments; the tenure endures for its fixed span, subject only to attaining maximum age or justifiable curtailment.

Parties
Appellant: Dr. L.P. Agarwal; Respondents: Union of India and Ors
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
21 July 1992
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Delhi High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; High Court judgment and Institute-Body resolution quashed
Legal Topics
Tenure Appointment, Premature Retirement, Superannuation, Recruitment Rules, Compulsory Retirement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr. L.P. Agarwal

Appellant

Union of India and Ors

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Delhi High Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the incumbent of the post of Director, AIIMS could be prematurely retired before the completion of his tenure
  2. 2 Applicability of superannuation and premature retirement provisions to a tenure post

Ratio Decidendi

A person holding a tenure post cannot be prematurely retired by invoking the concept of superannuation or compulsory retirement, which does not apply to such appointments; the tenure endures for its fixed span, subject only to attaining maximum age or justifiable curtailment.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; High Court judgment and Institute-Body resolution quashed

Orders

  • Resolution of Institute-Body dated November 24, 1980 and consequent order retiring appellant quashed
  • Appellant entitled to salary less non-practising allowance from December 1, 1981 to January 21, 1984