DR. NANDJEE SINGH versus P.G. MEDICAL STUDENTS ASSOCIATION AND ORS.
Appellant was qualified to appear in the M.D. (General Medicine) examination as a teacher candidate, having completed three years' training and fulfilling the requirements as per the relevant regulations, and the dispute was strictly individual and should not have been treated as public interest litigation.
- Parties
- Appellant: Dr. Nandjee Singh; Respondent: P.G. Medical Students Association; Respondent: S.K. Verma; Respondent: Ranjit Kumar
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Special Leave Appeal; Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Litigation, Eligibility for Medical Examination, Teaching Post Qualifications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr. Nandjee Singh
Appellant
P.G. Medical Students Association
Respondent
S.K. Verma
Respondent
Ranjit Kumar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Special Leave Appeal; Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellant was appointed against a teaching post
- 2 Whether appellant underwent the required three years training including one year house-job for M.D. (Medicine) examination
- 3 Whether the writ petition by the Association converted an individual dispute into public interest litigation
Ratio Decidendi
Appellant was qualified to appear in the M.D. (General Medicine) examination as a teacher candidate, having completed three years' training and fulfilling the requirements as per the relevant regulations, and the dispute was strictly individual and should not have been treated as public interest litigation.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Decision of the High Court set aside
- University directed to declare appellant's results in M.D. (General Medicine) examination forthwith
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment