DR. NIRMAL SINGH PANESAR versus MRS. PARAMJIT KAUR PANESAR @ AJINDER KAUR PANESAR
Appellant failed to prove cruelty or desertion under Section 13(1)(ia) and 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act; although the Supreme Court may, under Article 142, dissolve a marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown in appropriate cases, that discretion must be exercised cautiously and, on the facts (wife's lifelong maintenance of the marriage, care of children, willingness to care for husband and her sentiment against being a divorcee), dissolution would not do complete justice; appeal dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: DR. NIRMAL SINGH PANESAR; Respondent: MRS. PARAMJIT KAUR PANESAR @ AJINDER KAUR PANESAR
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court (final Judgment)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Cruelty, Desertion, Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage, Article 142
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DR. NIRMAL SINGH PANESAR
Appellant
MRS. PARAMJIT KAUR PANESAR @ AJINDER KAUR PANESAR
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court (final Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether irretrievable breakdown of marriage should result in dissolution under Article 142 when not a ground under the Hindu Marriage Act
- 2 Whether the appellant proved cruelty or desertion under Section 13(1)(ia) and 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Ratio Decidendi
Appellant failed to prove cruelty or desertion under Section 13(1)(ia) and 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act; although the Supreme Court may, under Article 142, dissolve a marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown in appropriate cases, that discretion must be exercised cautiously and, on the facts (wife's lifelong maintenance of the marriage, care of children, willingness to care for husband and her sentiment against being a divorcee), dissolution would not do complete justice; appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Judgment and order dated 18.02.2009 of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in LPA No.195 of 2001 in FAO No.44 of 2000 affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment