DR. RANBIR SINGH versus ASHARFI LAL
In eviction suits based on landlord-tenant relationship, the question of title is not germane except incidentally. Privity of contract and attornment established the appellant as landlord and respondent as tenant; denial of title by respondent was not bona fide and provided ground for eviction. High Court was not justified in reappreciating facts or substituting its own conclusion absent substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.
- Parties
- Appellant: Dr. Ranbir Singh; Respondent: Asharfi Lal
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court (appeal From High Court Decision)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Tenancy, Proof of Relationship, Title, Hardship, Civil Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr. Ranbir Singh
Appellant
Asharfi Lal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court (appeal From High Court Decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proof of title is germane in eviction suits based on landlord-tenant relationship
- 2 Whether appellant established privity of contract of tenancy
- 3 Whether High Court could reappreciate facts in second appeal under Section 100 CPC
Ratio Decidendi
In eviction suits based on landlord-tenant relationship, the question of title is not germane except incidentally. Privity of contract and attornment established the appellant as landlord and respondent as tenant; denial of title by respondent was not bona fide and provided ground for eviction. High Court was not justified in reappreciating facts or substituting its own conclusion absent substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment and order of High Court set aside
- Judgment and decree of Trial Court restored
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment