DR. TARAKPRASAD RAJARAM versus SMT. VESTA UKARA (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

DR. TARAKPRASAD RAJARAM versus SMT. VESTA UKARA (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

A person claiming title to agricultural land by assignment, transfer, auction sale, gift, or will, including from an ancestor, is not a landlord within the meaning of Section 31A(d), and is not entitled to evict tenants; only a person whose ancestor's name is recorded in the rights during the required period and who inherited the property qualifies as landlord for the purposes of eviction.

Parties
Appellant: Dr. Tarakprasad Rajaram; Respondents: Smt. Vesta Ukara (dead) by LRs. and Ors.; Minor Landlord: Ashok Kumar
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
18 September 1990
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Eviction, Landlord Tenant Relationship, Succession and Transfer, Legislative Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr. Tarakprasad Rajaram

Appellant

Smt. Vesta Ukara (dead) by LRs. and Ors.

Respondents

Ashok Kumar

Minor Landlord

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether a person obtaining title to agricultural land by will or gift is a 'landlord' entitled to seek eviction under Section 31A(d) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 as amended by Gujarat Act XVI of 1960.
  2. 2 Conditions required for the maintainability of eviction applications under Section 31A(d) of the Act.

Ratio Decidendi

A person claiming title to agricultural land by assignment, transfer, auction sale, gift, or will, including from an ancestor, is not a landlord within the meaning of Section 31A(d), and is not entitled to evict tenants; only a person whose ancestor's name is recorded in the rights during the required period and who inherited the property qualifies as landlord for the purposes of eviction.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; no order as to costs.