DR. UMA KANT AND ANR versus DR. BHIKA LAL JAIN AND ORS.

DR. UMA KANT AND ANR versus DR. BHIKA LAL JAIN AND ORS.

Appointment of a candidate from the reserve list upon retirement of the initially appointed candidate is valid, and the reserve list does not become extinct upon the original appointment; its purpose is to address anticipated or future vacancies within its validity period.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Dr. Uma Kant; Appellant: University of Rajasthan; Respondent: Dr. Bhika Lal Jain; Respondent: Dr. Shiv Sharma; Respondent: Dr. Sudhakar Mishra; Respondent: Dr. T.N. Bhardwaj
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
04 October 1991
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Outcome
appeals allowed
Legal Topics
University Appointments, Selection Committee Procedures, Reserve List Validity
Education Law Public Employment University Appointments Selection Committee Procedures Reserve List Validity

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr. Uma Kant

Appellant

University of Rajasthan

Appellant

Dr. Bhika Lal Jain

Respondent

Dr. Shiv Sharma

Respondent

Dr. Sudhakar Mishra

Respondent

Dr. T.N. Bhardwaj

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether appointment from the reserve list after retirement of selected candidate is valid under Rajasthan University Teachers and Officers (Selection for Appointment) Act, 1974
  2. 2 Whether reserve list becomes extinct after selection and appointment from main list

Ratio Decidendi

Appointment of a candidate from the reserve list upon retirement of the initially appointed candidate is valid, and the reserve list does not become extinct upon the original appointment; its purpose is to address anticipated or future vacancies within its validity period.

Court Disposition

appeals allowed

Orders

  • Impugned judgment of High Court set aside
  • Selection and appointment of Dr. Uma Kant as Professor in Botany held valid