DR. UMA KANT AND ANR versus DR. BHIKA LAL JAIN AND ORS.
Appointment of a candidate from the reserve list upon retirement of the initially appointed candidate is valid, and the reserve list does not become extinct upon the original appointment; its purpose is to address anticipated or future vacancies within its validity period.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Dr. Uma Kant; Appellant: University of Rajasthan; Respondent: Dr. Bhika Lal Jain; Respondent: Dr. Shiv Sharma; Respondent: Dr. Sudhakar Mishra; Respondent: Dr. T.N. Bhardwaj
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeals allowed
- Legal Topics
- University Appointments, Selection Committee Procedures, Reserve List Validity
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr. Uma Kant
Appellant
University of Rajasthan
Appellant
Dr. Bhika Lal Jain
Respondent
Dr. Shiv Sharma
Respondent
Dr. Sudhakar Mishra
Respondent
Dr. T.N. Bhardwaj
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appointment from the reserve list after retirement of selected candidate is valid under Rajasthan University Teachers and Officers (Selection for Appointment) Act, 1974
- 2 Whether reserve list becomes extinct after selection and appointment from main list
Ratio Decidendi
Appointment of a candidate from the reserve list upon retirement of the initially appointed candidate is valid, and the reserve list does not become extinct upon the original appointment; its purpose is to address anticipated or future vacancies within its validity period.
Court Disposition
appeals allowed
Orders
- Impugned judgment of High Court set aside
- Selection and appointment of Dr. Uma Kant as Professor in Botany held valid
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment