D.S. DALAL versus STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS,

D.S. DALAL versus STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS,

The evidence establishes that the complainant entrusted the suit and funds to the appellant; although the suit was filed, it was returned for objections and not refiled. There is no evidence to support the claim that the suit file was lost by the registry. The charge of misappropriation and failure to discharge professional duties is proved beyond reasonable doubt. No ground exists to interfere with the Bar Council’s order.

Parties
Appellant: D.S. Dalal; Respondents: State Bank of India and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
18 March 1993
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Order of Bar Council of India
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Professional Misconduct, Advocates Act, 1961

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

D.S. Dalal

Appellant

State Bank of India and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Order of Bar Council of India

  1. 1 Whether proceedings and findings of the Bar Council’s Disciplinary Committee against advocates for alleged professional misconduct were proper

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence establishes that the complainant entrusted the suit and funds to the appellant; although the suit was filed, it was returned for objections and not refiled. There is no evidence to support the claim that the suit file was lost by the registry. The charge of misappropriation and failure to discharge professional duties is proved beyond reasonable doubt. No ground exists to interfere with the Bar Council’s order.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No costs
  • Order of Bar Council of India upheld: removal from rolls and withdrawal of sanad