DUNLOP INDIA LIMLTED versus THEIR WORKMEN
Standing Orders and agreements binding only upon the affected employees; the concerned workman, not being a party to later union agreements, is entitled to continue in service until age 60. The Tribunal properly determined the retirement age given prevailing regional practice and absence of earlier binding rules.
- Parties
- Appellant: Dunlop India Limited; Respondent: Hari Nath Bhattacharjee (concerned workman); Respondent: Dunlop India Workmen
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 1972
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Industrial Tribunal Award
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Tribunal award affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Retirement Age, Employment Conditions, Standing Orders, Union Agreements, Industrial Dispute
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dunlop India Limited
Appellant
Hari Nath Bhattacharjee (concerned workman)
Respondent
Dunlop India Workmen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Industrial Tribunal Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the retirement of the concerned workman at age 58 is justified
- 2 Whether agreements between the company and unions regarding retirement age are binding on all employees
- 3 Whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide proper retirement age
Ratio Decidendi
Standing Orders and agreements binding only upon the affected employees; the concerned workman, not being a party to later union agreements, is entitled to continue in service until age 60. The Tribunal properly determined the retirement age given prevailing regional practice and absence of earlier binding rules.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Tribunal award affirmed.
Orders
- Award of the Tribunal confirmed
- Workman entitled to continue in service until age 60
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment