E. BAPANAIAH versus SRI K.S. RAJU ETC.
Respondent K.S. Raju, having controlled NFL and given a written undertaking to the CLB regarding repayment of deposits, wilfully disobeyed CLB’s orders and breached his undertaking. Division Bench erred in setting aside the conviction and sentence, as the absence of post-amendment execution provision justifies contempt remedy.
- Parties
- Appellant: E. Bapanaiah; Respondent: K.S. Raju
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench (high Court) Judgment, Supreme Court Ruling
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed against K.S. Raju; conviction and sentence restored for contempt. Appeals regarding other directors dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Civil Contempt, Breach of Undertaking, Execution of CLB Orders, Directors' Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E. Bapanaiah
Appellant
K.S. Raju
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench (high Court) Judgment, Supreme Court Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondent K.S. Raju committed civil contempt by breaching the undertaking given to Company Law Board
- 2 Whether Division Bench of High Court erred in allowing contempt appeal and setting aside conviction and sentence
Ratio Decidendi
Respondent K.S. Raju, having controlled NFL and given a written undertaking to the CLB regarding repayment of deposits, wilfully disobeyed CLB’s orders and breached his undertaking. Division Bench erred in setting aside the conviction and sentence, as the absence of post-amendment execution provision justifies contempt remedy.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed against K.S. Raju; conviction and sentence restored for contempt. Appeals regarding other directors dismissed.
Orders
- Order dated 3.8.2007 in Contempt Case No. 915 of 2002 restored against K.S. Raju (conviction and sentence).
- Sixty days granted to K.S. Raju to repay entire amount to appellant as directed by CLB.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment