E. MAHBOOB SAHEB versus N. SUBBARAYAN CHOWDHARY & ORS.
The High Court was not justified in reappreciating evidence or substituting its own conclusions for those of the lower court in the absence of a question of law; the finding of partition and allotment of the 'C' Schedule property to the plaintiff by the Additional District Judge stands.
- Parties
- Appellant: E. Mahboob Saheb; Respondent No. 1: N. Subbarayan Chowdhary; Other Respondents: Respondents 2(c) & (e); Other Respondent: Respondent No. 3
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 1981
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Andhra Pradesh High Court Judgment in S.a. Nos. 719 and 826 of 1967
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Second Appeal, Partition, Benami Transaction, Jurisdiction Under Section 100 CPC
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E. Mahboob Saheb
Appellant
N. Subbarayan Chowdhary
Respondent No. 1
Respondents 2(c) & (e)
Other Respondents
Respondent No. 3
Other Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Andhra Pradesh High Court Judgment in S.a. Nos. 719 and 826 of 1967
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court was justified in interfering with the finding of fact entered by the Additional District Judge regarding partition
- 2 Whether the purchase of property by the plaintiff was benami for Narayanaswamy
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court was not justified in reappreciating evidence or substituting its own conclusions for those of the lower court in the absence of a question of law; the finding of partition and allotment of the 'C' Schedule property to the plaintiff by the Additional District Judge stands.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Decision of the High Court set aside
- Judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge restored
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment