EDWINGSON BAREH versus STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS
The Governor is empowered under Paragraph 1(3)(c) of the Sixth Schedule to create a new autonomous district by public notification, provided the procedure, including appointment and consideration of a Commission's report, is properly followed. The exercise of this power is effective by itself and does not require confirmation or independent Parliamentary legislation to be operative. The mandatory provisions of Paragraph 14 were sufficiently complied with as the Governor considered the Commission's report and agreed with its recommendations.
- Parties
- Appellant: Edwingson Bareh; Respondent: State of Assam and others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 1965
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal From Assam and Nagaland High Court, Civil Rule No. 286 of 1964
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs, majority judgment; dissent by Hidayatullah, J.
- Legal Topics
- Governor's Powers Under Sixth Schedule, Creation of Autonomous Districts, Amendment of Schedule by Parliament, Compliance With Mandatory Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edwingson Bareh
Appellant
State of Assam and others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal From Assam and Nagaland High Court, Civil Rule No. 286 of 1964
Legal Issues
- 1 Does Paragraph 1(3) of the Sixth Schedule empower the Governor to create a new autonomous district without Parliamentary legislation?
- 2 Was the mandatory procedure under Paragraph 14 of the Sixth Schedule complied with in issuing the Notification?
Ratio Decidendi
The Governor is empowered under Paragraph 1(3)(c) of the Sixth Schedule to create a new autonomous district by public notification, provided the procedure, including appointment and consideration of a Commission's report, is properly followed. The exercise of this power is effective by itself and does not require confirmation or independent Parliamentary legislation to be operative. The mandatory provisions of Paragraph 14 were sufficiently complied with as the Governor considered the Commission's report and agreed with its recommendations.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs, majority judgment; dissent by Hidayatullah, J.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Respondent State to bear costs throughout (per dissenting opinion)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment