G.S. DHARA SINGH versus E.K. THOMAS & ORS.
Workers who cease to be members of a trade union are entitled to demand an account and claim a refund of amounts received by the trade union from management for and on their behalf, as such amounts were not shown to have become part of the general funds under any binding scheme or settlement; civil courts have jurisdiction to entertain such suits, which are not barred by the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 or Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
- Parties
- Petitioner: G.S. OHARA SINGH; Respondent: E.K. THOMAS; Respondent: K.K. Surendran; Respondent: Cochin Port Thozhilali Union (General Secretary); Respondent: President, Cochin Railway Forwarding Agents Association
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Special Leave Petition dismissed; judgment of High Court affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Trade Union Funds, Refund/accountability by Office Bearers, Civil Jurisdiction, Resignation From Trade Union
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G.S. OHARA SINGH
Petitioner
E.K. THOMAS
Respondent
K.K. Surendran
Respondent
Cochin Port Thozhilali Union (General Secretary)
Respondent
President, Cochin Railway Forwarding Agents Association
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a worker who resigns from a trade union is entitled to demand an account and refund of amounts received by the trade union from management for and on his behalf.
- 2 Whether the civil suits for such refund/account are maintainable in civil court or barred by Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
Ratio Decidendi
Workers who cease to be members of a trade union are entitled to demand an account and claim a refund of amounts received by the trade union from management for and on their behalf, as such amounts were not shown to have become part of the general funds under any binding scheme or settlement; civil courts have jurisdiction to entertain such suits, which are not barred by the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 or Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
Court Disposition
Special Leave Petition dismissed; judgment of High Court affirmed.
Orders
- Petitioner and respondent no. 3 to render account of amounts received towards accident benefit fund and gratuity for specified period to former members who resigned.
- Each plaintiff entitled to proportionate share as per account rendered.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment