EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE BHOWRA COLLIERY versus THEIR WORKMEN
Malis working in officers’ bungalows were employed on domestic and personal work within the meaning of paragraph 3(b) of the Bonus Scheme under the Act and are therefore not entitled to bonus. The award of the Tribunal granting them bonus cannot be sustained.
- Parties
- Appellant: Employers in relation to the Bhowra Colliery; Respondent: Their Workmen
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 1962
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave Against the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Dhanbad, Dated December 7, 1959 in Reference No. 42 of 1959
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Bonus, Entitlement to Bonus, Interpretation of 'domestic and Personal Work' Under Bonus Scheme, Coal Mines Provident Fund and Bonus Schemes Act, 1948
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Employers in relation to the Bhowra Colliery
Appellant
Their Workmen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave Against the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Dhanbad, Dated December 7, 1959 in Reference No. 42 of 1959
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the malis working in officers' bungalows are entitled to bonus under the Coal Mines Bonus Scheme, 1948.
- 2 Whether the malis are employed on domestic and personal work within the meaning of paragraph 3(b) of the Bonus Scheme.
Ratio Decidendi
Malis working in officers’ bungalows were employed on domestic and personal work within the meaning of paragraph 3(b) of the Bonus Scheme under the Act and are therefore not entitled to bonus. The award of the Tribunal granting them bonus cannot be sustained.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed.
Orders
- Award of the Tribunal as regards the disputes referred is set aside.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment