E.S.IC. MEDICAL OFFICER'S ASSOCIATION versus E.S.L.C. & ANR.
Medical doctors treating patients and diagnosing diseases are professionals, not workmen under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, due to the nature of their work and the distinction between profession and occupation.
- Parties
- Petitioner: E.S.I.C. Medical Officer's Association; Respondent: E.S.I.C.; Respondent: Another Respondent (ANR.)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Decision on SLP Against Delhi High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Definition of Workman, Profession Versus Occupation, Medical Professionals Under Industrial Disputes Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E.S.I.C. Medical Officer's Association
Petitioner
E.S.I.C.
Respondent
Another Respondent (ANR.)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Decision on SLP Against Delhi High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether medical doctors in ESIC dispensaries/hospitals are workmen under Section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Ratio Decidendi
Medical doctors treating patients and diagnosing diseases are professionals, not workmen under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, due to the nature of their work and the distinction between profession and occupation.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed.
Orders
- SLP dismissed; no interference with the High Court judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment