EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS (P) LTD. versus MICHAEL MARK AND ANOTHER

EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS (P) LTD. versus MICHAEL MARK AND ANOTHER

Removal from muster roll amounted to termination of employment by the employer without notice, entitling the employees to compensation under Standing Order 25(1). Absence due to strike cannot be treated as abandonment.

Parties
Appellant: Express Newspapers (P) Ltd.; Respondent: Michael Mark; Respondent: First 97 respondents in C.A. No. 295 of 1961
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
25 July 1962
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeals / Appeal From Bombay High Court Judgment and Orders Dated September 4 and 5, 1958, and October 6, 1958
Outcome
Appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Strike, Termination of Employment, Standing Orders, Payment of Wages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Express Newspapers (P) Ltd.

Appellant

Michael Mark

Respondent

First 97 respondents in C.A. No. 295 of 1961

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeals / Appeal From Bombay High Court Judgment and Orders Dated September 4 and 5, 1958, and October 6, 1958

  1. 1 Whether absence from work on account of strike amounts to abandonment of employment
  2. 2 Whether termination without notice is permissible under Standing Order 25(1)
  3. 3 Entitlement to statutory compensation under Standing Orders when employment is terminated without notice

Ratio Decidendi

Removal from muster roll amounted to termination of employment by the employer without notice, entitling the employees to compensation under Standing Order 25(1). Absence due to strike cannot be treated as abandonment.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed

Orders

  • Respondents entitled to relief under Standing Order 25(1) for termination without notice
  • Costs awarded; one hearing fee