FENNER (INDIA) LTD. versus COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADURAI
PVC impregnated cotton conveyor belting and PVC impregnated flame resistant colliery conveyor belting manufactured by the appellants are not 'strips' under Tariff Heading 39.20; in view of the Chapter Note and Harmonised Coding System Explanatory Note, they are classifiable under Heading 39.22.90 for period up to 9.2.1987 and under Heading 39.26.90 for period after 10.2.1987.
- Parties
- Appellant: Fenner (India) Ltd.; Respondent: Collector of Central Excise, Madurai
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Order of Customs, Excise and Gold (control) Appellate Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed
- Legal Topics
- Tariff Classification, Interpretation of Tariff Schedule, Tariff Headings for Conveyor Belts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fenner (India) Ltd.
Appellant
Collector of Central Excise, Madurai
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Order of Customs, Excise and Gold (control) Appellate Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether PVC impregnated conveyor belting is classifiable under Tariff Heading 39.20 or under Tariff Heading 39.22 (for period up to 9.2.1987) and under Heading 39.26 (after 10.2.1987)
- 2 Interpretation of tariff schedule and chapter notes in classification under Central Excise law
Ratio Decidendi
PVC impregnated cotton conveyor belting and PVC impregnated flame resistant colliery conveyor belting manufactured by the appellants are not 'strips' under Tariff Heading 39.20; in view of the Chapter Note and Harmonised Coding System Explanatory Note, they are classifiable under Heading 39.22.90 for period up to 9.2.1987 and under Heading 39.26.90 for period after 10.2.1987.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed
Orders
- Judgment and order under appeal is set aside.
- Respondents are directed to classify the appellants' conveyor belts under Tariff Heading 39.22.90 for December 1986 to 9th February 1987, and under Tariff Heading 39.26.90 for 10th February 1987 to June 1987.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment