FEROZ AHMAD versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS.

FEROZ AHMAD versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS.

Since it is not clear whether the service regulations relied upon were validly framed and in accordance with the statutory provisions, and constitutionality was not challenged earlier, the appellant should be given an opportunity to challenge the validity and/or constitutionality of the rules. Matter remitted to High Court for fresh determination of the validity of the rules.

Parties
Appellant: Feroz Ahmad; Respondent No. 1: Delhi Development Authority; Advocate for Respondents: Nitin Thalwal
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
29 September 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision Remitting to High Court Division Bench
Outcome
Appeal disposed of; matter remitted for fresh consideration
Legal Topics
Seniority, Statutory Rules, Upgradation of Pay Scale, Promotion, Constitutionality of Regulations
Service Law Seniority Statutory Rules Upgradation of Pay Scale Promotion Constitutionality of Regulations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Feroz Ahmad

Appellant

Delhi Development Authority

Respondent No. 1

Nitin Thalwal

Advocate for Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision Remitting to High Court Division Bench

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the denial of seniority and upgradation of pay-scale to the appellant, as opposed to similarly situated juniors, is valid under the statutory rules of the Delhi Development Act, 1957
  2. 2 Whether the statutory rules/regulations were validly framed and are constitutional

Ratio Decidendi

Since it is not clear whether the service regulations relied upon were validly framed and in accordance with the statutory provisions, and constitutionality was not challenged earlier, the appellant should be given an opportunity to challenge the validity and/or constitutionality of the rules. Matter remitted to High Court for fresh determination of the validity of the rules.

Court Disposition

Appeal disposed of; matter remitted for fresh consideration

Orders

  • Impugned judgment of the Division Bench set aside
  • Matter remitted to Division Bench of the High Court for fresh consideration