FIRMS AMAR NATH BASHESHAR DASS versus TEK CHAND
Filing of the suit for ejectment within the 5-year exemption period satisfies the conditions for exemption from Section 13; there is no requirement that the decree for eviction must be obtained within that period. The exemption applies to decrees arising from such suits, even if passed after the lapse of 5 years since completion of the building.
- Parties
- Appellant: Firm Amar Nath Basheshar Dass; Respondent: Tek Chand
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 1972
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order of Punjab and Haryana High Court in Execution Second Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Exemption From Rent Restriction, Execution of Eviction Decrees, Interpretation of Notifications Under Rent Acts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Firm Amar Nath Basheshar Dass
Appellant
Tek Chand
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order of Punjab and Haryana High Court in Execution Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether exemption from Section 13 of Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act applies when decree for eviction is passed after expiry of 5-year period since completion of building, if suit was filed within the five years
Ratio Decidendi
Filing of the suit for ejectment within the 5-year exemption period satisfies the conditions for exemption from Section 13; there is no requirement that the decree for eviction must be obtained within that period. The exemption applies to decrees arising from such suits, even if passed after the lapse of 5 years since completion of the building.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment