GAJANAN SAMADHAN LANDE versus SANJAY SHYAMRAO DHOTRE
An elected Director position is not disqualified under Section 10 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 or Article 102(1)(a) of the Constitution, as the role is not by appointment, is not removable by Government, and allowances received are not 'profit' or remuneration but reimbursement of expenses.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Gajanan Samadhan Lande; Respondent: Sanjay Shyamrao Dhotre
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disqualification From Elections, Office of Profit, Representation of People Act, Interpretation of Statutory Provisions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gajanan Samadhan Lande
Appellant
Sanjay Shyamrao Dhotre
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an elected Director of a Government company holding more than 25% Government share is disqualified under Section 10 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 and Article 102(1)(a) of the Constitution for being a member of Parliament
- 2 Whether allowances received as Director constitute 'profit' or remuneration
Ratio Decidendi
An elected Director position is not disqualified under Section 10 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 or Article 102(1)(a) of the Constitution, as the role is not by appointment, is not removable by Government, and allowances received are not 'profit' or remuneration but reimbursement of expenses.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment