GANGA BAI versus VIJAY KUMAR & ORS .
An appeal against a mere finding is not maintainable under the Code of Civil Procedure. The High Court should not have allowed the amendment of the memorandum of appeal after over 7 years without good cause shown and without an application for condonation of delay.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ganga Bai; Respondents: Vijay Kumar & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 09 April 1974
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Decree Dated 19th March, 1968 of Bombay High Court at Nagpur in First Appeal No. 72 of 1959
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Maintainability of Appeal, Amendment of Memorandum of Appeal, Delay and Condonation, Appeal Against Finding, Partition Under Hindu Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ganga Bai
Appellant
Vijay Kumar & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Decree Dated 19th March, 1968 of Bombay High Court at Nagpur in First Appeal No. 72 of 1959
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an appeal against a mere finding of fact is maintainable under the Code of Civil Procedure
- 2 Whether it was proper for the High Court to allow amendment of the memorandum of appeal after over 7 years without application for condonation of delay or good cause shown
Ratio Decidendi
An appeal against a mere finding is not maintainable under the Code of Civil Procedure. The High Court should not have allowed the amendment of the memorandum of appeal after over 7 years without good cause shown and without an application for condonation of delay.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment of High Court set aside
- Judgment of trial court restored
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment