GANGADHARA PALO versus THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER & ANOTHER
Where Special Leave Petition (SLP) is dismissed without giving any reasons, there is no merger of the High Court judgment with the Supreme Court order, and the High Court judgment continues to exist and is capable of review; delay of 71 days should have been condoned by the High Court and the review petition decided on merits.
- Parties
- Appellant: Gangadhara Palo; Respondents: Revenue Divisional Officer & Another
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Order Dismissing Review Petition and Application for Condonation of Delay
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Review Petition, Doctrine of Merger, Condonation of Delay, Precedent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gangadhara Palo
Appellant
Revenue Divisional Officer & Another
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Order Dismissing Review Petition and Application for Condonation of Delay
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether review petition before the High Court is maintainable after dismissal of Special Leave Petition by Supreme Court without reasons
- 2 Whether delay of 71 days in filing review petition should be condoned
Ratio Decidendi
Where Special Leave Petition (SLP) is dismissed without giving any reasons, there is no merger of the High Court judgment with the Supreme Court order, and the High Court judgment continues to exist and is capable of review; delay of 71 days should have been condoned by the High Court and the review petition decided on merits.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned order of the High Court set aside
- Delay in filing the review petition before the High Court condoned
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment