GANU RAM versus RIKHI RAM KAUNDAL AND ORS.
The certificate appended to the nomination paper specifying the appellant's scheduled caste fulfills the statutory requirement under section 33(2) of the Act; thus the nomination paper is valid and its acceptance by the Returning Officer was proper.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ganu Ram; Respondent: Rikhi Ram Kaundal
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Himachal Pradesh High Court Decision in Election Petition
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Election of the appellant is upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Nomination Papers, Interpretation of Statutory Requirements for Reserved Seats, Scheduled Castes and Tribes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ganu Ram
Appellant
Rikhi Ram Kaundal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Himachal Pradesh High Court Decision in Election Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the requirements of section 33(2) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 are satisfied when a candidate annexes a caste certificate to the nomination paper instead of declaring caste within the form itself
- 2 Whether the nomination paper was valid under the Act
Ratio Decidendi
The certificate appended to the nomination paper specifying the appellant's scheduled caste fulfills the statutory requirement under section 33(2) of the Act; thus the nomination paper is valid and its acceptance by the Returning Officer was proper.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Election of the appellant is upheld.
Orders
- Order of the High Court setting aside election of the appellant is set aside.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment