GAUHATI UNIVERSITY versus SHRI NIHARLAL BHATTACHARJEE
The summons was not duly served because the appellant did not have sufficient time to appear, and the adjourned date was not communicated. Therefore, limitation ran from the date of knowledge of the ex parte decree, and the application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC was filed within 30 days from knowledge.
- Parties
- Appellant: Gauhati University; Respondent: Shri Niharlal Bhattacharjee
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; ex parte decree set aside; matter remitted to Trial Court
- Legal Topics
- Ex Parte Decree, Service of Summons, Limitation Period, Setting Aside Decree
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gauhati University
Appellant
Shri Niharlal Bhattacharjee
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 When does limitation begin for an application to set aside an ex parte decree under Order IX Rule 13, CPC, when summons is not duly served?
- 2 What constitutes 'duly served' summons under Order IX Rule 6, CPC?
Ratio Decidendi
The summons was not duly served because the appellant did not have sufficient time to appear, and the adjourned date was not communicated. Therefore, limitation ran from the date of knowledge of the ex parte decree, and the application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC was filed within 30 days from knowledge.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; ex parte decree set aside; matter remitted to Trial Court
Orders
- Appellant shall appear before the Trial Court on December 4, 1995
- Trial Court to take necessary steps including filing of written statement
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment