GAURI SHANKAR PRASAD AND ORS versus BRAHMA NAND SINGH
Where the sale and agreement to repurchase are in separate documents, the transaction is not a mortgage, and in agreements for re-conveyance, time fixed for performance must be strictly complied with and is the essence of the contract. Plaintiff's failure to pay consideration within stipulated period defeats their right to specific performance.
- Parties
- Appellant: Gauri Shankar Prasad and Ors.; Respondent: Brahma Nano Singh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Before Supreme Court After Dismissal of Second Appeal by High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Essence of Time in Contracts, Sale and Agreement to Repurchase, Limitation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gauri Shankar Prasad and Ors.
Appellant
Brahma Nano Singh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Before Supreme Court After Dismissal of Second Appeal by High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit is barred by law of limitations
- 2 Whether appellants were always ready and willing to perform their part under s.16(c) Specific Relief Act
- 3 Whether time was essence of the contract
Ratio Decidendi
Where the sale and agreement to repurchase are in separate documents, the transaction is not a mortgage, and in agreements for re-conveyance, time fixed for performance must be strictly complied with and is the essence of the contract. Plaintiff's failure to pay consideration within stipulated period defeats their right to specific performance.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment