GEETA versus STATE OF M.P. AND ORS.
Appellant was afforded sufficient opportunities by both the Screening Committee and Supreme Court to establish Scheduled Tribe status but failed to do so. The Scheduled Tribe certificate was based on her father's certificate, which was cancelled. The documentary evidence and inquiries proved she belongs to Nishad/Mallah, a backward caste, not Majhi Tribe. Thus, her appointment frustrated the constitutional guarantee for deserving candidates in the reserved quota.
- Parties
- Appellant: Geeta; Respondents: State of M.P. and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appointment on Reserved Post, Scheduled Tribe Certificate, Natural Justice, Social Status Certificate
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Geeta
Appellant
State of M.P. and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant Geeta belongs to Majhi Tribe (Scheduled Tribe) or Nishad/Mallah (Backward Caste)
- 2 Whether principles of natural justice were followed by the High Level Caste Screening Committee
Ratio Decidendi
Appellant was afforded sufficient opportunities by both the Screening Committee and Supreme Court to establish Scheduled Tribe status but failed to do so. The Scheduled Tribe certificate was based on her father's certificate, which was cancelled. The documentary evidence and inquiries proved she belongs to Nishad/Mallah, a backward caste, not Majhi Tribe. Thus, her appointment frustrated the constitutional guarantee for deserving candidates in the reserved quota.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Parties are to bear their own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment