MIS DAKSHIN SHELTERS PVT. LTD. versus GEETA S. JOHARI
The petitioner's right to appoint its arbitrator under the arbitration clause of the Development Agreement was extinguished once it failed to appoint the arbitrator on receipt of the notice. The Designate Judge’s appointment of an arbitrator on behalf of the petitioner under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was valid and in conformity with Supreme Court precedent.
- Parties
- Petitioner: MIS Dakshin Shelters Pvt. Ltd.; Respondent: Geeta S. Johari
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Decision
- Outcome
- Special Leave Petition dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration Clause, Extinguishing of Right to Appoint Arbitrator, Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MIS Dakshin Shelters Pvt. Ltd.
Petitioner
Geeta S. Johari
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Designate Judge erred in appointing an arbitrator on behalf of the petitioner under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when the petitioner failed to nominate its arbitrator as per the arbitration clause.
Ratio Decidendi
The petitioner's right to appoint its arbitrator under the arbitration clause of the Development Agreement was extinguished once it failed to appoint the arbitrator on receipt of the notice. The Designate Judge’s appointment of an arbitrator on behalf of the petitioner under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was valid and in conformity with Supreme Court precedent.
Court Disposition
Special Leave Petition dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The Special Leave Petition is dismissed.
- The Rs. 1 lakh deposited by the petitioner in the Registry of the Supreme Court shall be paid to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment