THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY versus RANGACHARI

THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY versus RANGACHARI

Article 16(4) of the Constitution authorises the State to reserve appointments and selection posts for backward classes, including Scheduled Castes and Tribes, within the services of the State, and extends to promotions. The circulars issued by the Railway Board fall within the ambit of Article 16(4).

Parties
Appellant: General Manager, Southern Railway; Respondent: K. Rangachari
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
28 April 1961
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated March 3, 1960 of Madras High Court, W.p. No. 1051 of 1959
Outcome
Appeal allowed; respondent's application for writ dismissed; High Court decision reversed.
Legal Topics
Reservation in Public Services, Scheduled Castes and Tribes, Promotion in Government Service

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

General Manager, Southern Railway

Appellant

K. Rangachari

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated March 3, 1960 of Madras High Court, W.p. No. 1051 of 1959

  1. 1 Whether 'appointments' and 'posts' in Article 16(4) of the Constitution include promotions and selection posts within government service
  2. 2 Whether reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes can be applied retrospectively to selection posts
  3. 3 Interpretation of 'backward classes' and scope of reservation under Articles 16(1), 16(4), and 335

Ratio Decidendi

Article 16(4) of the Constitution authorises the State to reserve appointments and selection posts for backward classes, including Scheduled Castes and Tribes, within the services of the State, and extends to promotions. The circulars issued by the Railway Board fall within the ambit of Article 16(4).

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; respondent's application for writ dismissed; High Court decision reversed.

Orders

  • Respondent's application for a writ is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.