GENERAL MANAGER, UCO BANK & ANR. versus M. VENURANGANATH
Since respondent's suspension was for criminal offence and he was acquitted (even by benefit of doubt), Clause 22(8) of the Manual entitles him to all benefits as if he had been on duty, overriding Regulation 15(2).
- Parties
- Appellant: General Manager, UCO Bank & Anr.; Respondent: M. Venuranganath
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench Judgment of Andhra Pradesh High Court in Writ Appeal No. 685 of 2004
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Bank Disciplinary Proceedings, Suspension, Entitlement to Pay and Allowances After Acquittal, Departmental Proceedings Post Acquittal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
General Manager, UCO Bank & Anr.
Appellant
M. Venuranganath
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench Judgment of Andhra Pradesh High Court in Writ Appeal No. 685 of 2004
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondent is entitled to pay and allowances for the suspension period after acquittal in criminal trial
- 2 Applicability of Clause 22(8) of Manual on Disciplinary Action and Related Matters of UCO Bank vs. Regulation 15(2) of United Commercial Bank (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Regulation, 1976
Ratio Decidendi
Since respondent's suspension was for criminal offence and he was acquitted (even by benefit of doubt), Clause 22(8) of the Manual entitles him to all benefits as if he had been on duty, overriding Regulation 15(2).
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Respondent entitled to all benefits for suspension period as if he had been on duty.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment