GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, GHAZIABAD versus SMT. JAIMALA
Since the sale deed has already been registered in favour of the respondent, execution should be subject to the outcome of the pending appeal; exemplary costs imposed by High Court are not justified and are set aside.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ghaziabad Development Authority, Ghaziabad; Respondent: Smt. Jaimala
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 December 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed to extent of setting aside exemplary costs; sale deed execution subject to appeal result.
- Legal Topics
- Execution of Decree, Stay of Execution, Exemplary Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ghaziabad Development Authority, Ghaziabad
Appellant
Smt. Jaimala
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Legality of execution of decree during stay
- 2 Imposition of exemplary costs
Ratio Decidendi
Since the sale deed has already been registered in favour of the respondent, execution should be subject to the outcome of the pending appeal; exemplary costs imposed by High Court are not justified and are set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed to extent of setting aside exemplary costs; sale deed execution subject to appeal result.
Orders
- Exemplary costs of Rs. 25,000 imposed by High Court set aside.
- Execution of sale deed to be subject to result in pending appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment