GIRDHAR KUMAR DADHITCH AND ANR. versus ST ATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.
A select list prepared in 1998 expired after one year and, in the absence of proof of legal extension, appointments cannot be made from it for posts filled in 2003. Supreme Court's prospective overruling of the bonus marks provision in Kailash Chand Sharma protects only those appointed before the cut-off date; unsuccessful candidates are not liable to be appointed after the expiry of the select list.
- Parties
- Appellant: Girdhar Kumar Dadhitch; Respondent: State of Rajasthan; Appellant: Mukul Kumar; Appellant: Rishi Matoliya; Appellant: P.O. Sharma; Respondent: Aruneshwar Gupta
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appointment, Select List Validity, Bonus Marks, Prospective Overruling
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Girdhar Kumar Dadhitch
Appellant
State of Rajasthan
Respondent
Mukul Kumar
Appellant
Rishi Matoliya
Appellant
P.O. Sharma
Appellant
Aruneshwar Gupta
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellants are entitled to appointment to the post of Physical Education Teacher Grade-III after expiry of select list and prospective overruling of bonus marks provision.
- 2 Whether Supreme Court's decision in Kailash Chand Sharma applies to vacancies arising after the cut-off date.
Ratio Decidendi
A select list prepared in 1998 expired after one year and, in the absence of proof of legal extension, appointments cannot be made from it for posts filled in 2003. Supreme Court's prospective overruling of the bonus marks provision in Kailash Chand Sharma protects only those appointed before the cut-off date; unsuccessful candidates are not liable to be appointed after the expiry of the select list.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with no order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment