HARISHANKAR RASTOGI versus GIRDHARI SHARMA AND ANR.
A non-advocate may not appear as of right to represent a party in the Supreme Court, but the court has discretion to permit such representation on a case-by-case basis considering factors such as antecedents, relationship, reasons for such request, and other relevant circumstances.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Harishankar Rastogi; Respondent: Girdhari Sharma; Amicus Curiae: Supreme Court Bar Association
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 1978
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Misc. Petition / Application for Cancellation of Appointment of Amicus Curiae and for Permission to Be Represented by Another Person
- Outcome
- Petition allowed
- Legal Topics
- Right of Audience, Non Advocate Representation, Permission for Appearance by Private Person
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harishankar Rastogi
Petitioner
Girdhari Sharma
Respondent
Supreme Court Bar Association
Amicus Curiae
Procedural Posture
Criminal Misc. Petition / Application for Cancellation of Appointment of Amicus Curiae and for Permission to Be Represented by Another Person
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a person who is not an advocate can be permitted to plead on behalf of a party in the Supreme Court
Ratio Decidendi
A non-advocate may not appear as of right to represent a party in the Supreme Court, but the court has discretion to permit such representation on a case-by-case basis considering factors such as antecedents, relationship, reasons for such request, and other relevant circumstances.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed
Orders
- Petitioner permitted to be represented by a private person as prayed for, subject to the condition that the permission will be withdrawn if the person proves unworthy.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment