GKN DRIVESHAFTS (INDIA) LTD. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER AND ORS.
A writ petition challenging the issuance of notice under Section 148 is premature. Objections must be raised with the assessing officer, who is bound to provide reasons and dispose of objections by a speaking order before proceeding with the assessment.
- Parties
- Appellant: GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd.; Respondents: Income Tax Officer and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / On Appeal From Dismissal of Writ Petition by High Court
- Outcome
- civil appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax Act, 1961, Notice Under Section 148, Section 143(2), Procedure for Challenging Reassessment Notice, Writ Petition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd.
Appellant
Income Tax Officer and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / On Appeal From Dismissal of Writ Petition by High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a writ petition challenging the issuance of notices under Sections 148 and 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was premature
- 2 What is the proper procedure when a notice under Section 148 is issued
Ratio Decidendi
A writ petition challenging the issuance of notice under Section 148 is premature. Objections must be raised with the assessing officer, who is bound to provide reasons and dispose of objections by a speaking order before proceeding with the assessment.
Court Disposition
civil appeals dismissed
Orders
- Assessing officer must dispose of objections, if any, by a speaking order before proceeding with assessment for the five relevant assessment years.
- Appellate authority is directed to dispose of any appeals against the orders of assessment expeditiously.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment