GLOBAL ENERGY LTD. & ANR. versus CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Clauses (b) and (f) of Regulation 6A of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Procedure, Terms and Conditions for Grant of Trading License and other related matters) (Amendment) Regulations, 2006 are ultra vires the Constitution of India as well as the Electricity Act, 2003, for want of objective guidelines, excessive subjectivity, vagueness, and perpetuation of injustice and uncertainty in licensing. Disqualifying statutes must have definite, rational, and objective standards. Delegated legislation cannot create substantive rights or liabilities not contemplated by the parent Act. Judicial review does not cure invalid subordinate legislation.
- Parties
- Appellant: Global Energy Ltd.; Respondent: Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Subordinate Legislation, Licensing Under Electricity Act, Parameters of Judicial Review, Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Global Energy Ltd.
Appellant
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clauses (b) and (f) of Regulation 6A of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Regulations, 2006 are constitutionally valid
- 2 Whether the clauses are ultra vires the Electricity Act, 2003 and the Constitution of India
- 3 What parameters must govern disqualification for electricity trading license under delegated legislation
Ratio Decidendi
Clauses (b) and (f) of Regulation 6A of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Procedure, Terms and Conditions for Grant of Trading License and other related matters) (Amendment) Regulations, 2006 are ultra vires the Constitution of India as well as the Electricity Act, 2003, for want of objective guidelines, excessive subjectivity, vagueness, and perpetuation of injustice and uncertainty in licensing. Disqualifying statutes must have definite, rational, and objective standards. Delegated legislation cannot create substantive rights or liabilities not contemplated by the parent Act. Judicial review does not cure invalid subordinate legislation.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed
Orders
- Impugned High Court judgment set aside
- Clauses (b) and (f) of Regulation 6A declared ultra vires the Constitution and Electricity Act
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment