GOHAR BEGAM versus SUGGI ALIAS NAZMA BEGAM AND OTHERS
The mother of an illegitimate Muslim female child is entitled to custody under Mohammedan Law, and refusal to return the child amounts to illegal detention under s. 491 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The existence of an alternative civil remedy does not bar relief under s. 491. The welfare of the child, in this case, does not provide justification for denying the mother’s custody.
- Parties
- Appellant: Gohar Begam; Respondent: Suggi alias Nazma Begam; Respondents: Respondents Nos. 1 to 4 and 6; Respondent: Respondent No. 5; Respondent: State of Bombay
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 1959
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Order of the Bombay High Court in Criminal Application No. 508 of 1958
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Habeas Corpus, Custody of Illegitimate Child, Mohammedan Law, Alternative Remedy, Welfare of Child
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gohar Begam
Appellant
Suggi alias Nazma Begam
Respondent
Respondents Nos. 1 to 4 and 6
Respondents
Respondent No. 5
Respondent
State of Bombay
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Order of the Bombay High Court in Criminal Application No. 508 of 1958
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an unmarried Sunni Muslim mother of an illegitimate female child is entitled to custody under Mohammedan Law
- 2 Whether refusal to return the child constitutes illegal detention under s. 491 of the Criminal Procedure Code
- 3 Whether an alternative remedy under the Guardians and Wards Act bars habeas corpus
Ratio Decidendi
The mother of an illegitimate Muslim female child is entitled to custody under Mohammedan Law, and refusal to return the child amounts to illegal detention under s. 491 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The existence of an alternative civil remedy does not bar relief under s. 491. The welfare of the child, in this case, does not provide justification for denying the mother’s custody.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment and order of the High Court set aside.
- Respondents other than the State of Bombay directed to make over the custody of the child Anjum to the appellant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment