AMADALAVALASA COOPERATIVE. AGRICULTURAL & INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY LTD. & ANOTHER versus UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER
Liability to pay evaded insurance premia under the Emergency Risks (Goods) Insurance Act, 1962 and Emergency Risks (Factories) Insurance Act, 1962 arose during the operation of the Acts and could be ascertained and enforced after their expiry by virtue of section 6 of the General Clauses Act. Challenge to such liability under Articles 14, 19, and 31 does not survive as the rights under Article 19 were suspended during the Emergency and any liability incurred could be enforced post-Emergency.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Amadalavalasa Cooperative Agricultural & Industrial Society Ltd.; Petitioner: K. Rajendra Chowdhary; Appellant/respondent: B. Sen; Appellant/respondent: G. S. Rama Rao; Appellant/respondent: Naunit Lal; Appellant/respondent: K. Srinivasamurthy; Appellant/respondent: Lalita Kohli; Respondent: Gopalaratnam; Respondent: A. T. M. Sampath
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 1975
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeals and Writ Petition Under Article 32 / Appeal From High Court and Original Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Writ Petition dismissed; Civil Appeals Nos. 506-510, 842-844, 1710-1713 of 1971 dismissed; Civil Appeals Nos. 2319-2354 of 1972 allowed; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Effect of Emergency Proclamation, Application of General Clauses Act After Expiry of Statute, Validity of Compulsory Insurance Statutes, Article 19 and 31 Challenges During and After Emergency, Recovery of Insurance Premia Evaded Under Statutory Schemes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amadalavalasa Cooperative Agricultural & Industrial Society Ltd.
Petitioner
K. Rajendra Chowdhary
Petitioner
B. Sen
Appellant/respondent
G. S. Rama Rao
Appellant/respondent
Naunit Lal
Appellant/respondent
K. Srinivasamurthy
Appellant/respondent
Lalita Kohli
Appellant/respondent
Gopalaratnam
Respondent
A. T. M. Sampath
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeals and Writ Petition Under Article 32 / Appeal From High Court and Original Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether liability for evaded insurance premia under Emergency Risks Insurance Acts incurred during Emergency can be enforced after expiry of Emergency and the Acts
- 2 Whether provisions of the Emergency Risks (Goods) Insurance Act, 1962 and the Emergency Risks (Factories) Insurance Act, 1962 violate Articles 14, 19, and 31 of the Constitution
- 3 Whether section 6 of the General Clauses Act applies to permit determination and recovery of such liability after expiry of the Acts
Ratio Decidendi
Liability to pay evaded insurance premia under the Emergency Risks (Goods) Insurance Act, 1962 and Emergency Risks (Factories) Insurance Act, 1962 arose during the operation of the Acts and could be ascertained and enforced after their expiry by virtue of section 6 of the General Clauses Act. Challenge to such liability under Articles 14, 19, and 31 does not survive as the rights under Article 19 were suspended during the Emergency and any liability incurred could be enforced post-Emergency.
Court Disposition
Writ Petition dismissed; Civil Appeals Nos. 506-510, 842-844, 1710-1713 of 1971 dismissed; Civil Appeals Nos. 2319-2354 of 1972 allowed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Writ Petition No. 461 of 1971 dismissed.
- Civil Appeals Nos. 506-510, 842-844, 1710-1713 of 1971 dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment