GOVARDHAN DASS & 8 ORS. versus SMT. SITABAI
Transfers of cultivatory rights of occupancy or ex-proprietary tenants through mortgage decrees or insolvency proceedings are void under ss. 12 and 49 of the Central Provinces Tenancy Act, as such transfers require permission of the revenue authority and do not automatically pass in insolvency. Thus, mortgagors (and their survivors) retain occupancy rights regardless of mortgagee's acquisition of proprietary rights by court order.
- Parties
- Appellant: Gov Ardhan Dass & 8 Ors.; Respondent: Smt. Sitabai
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 1968
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeals / Supreme Court of India Appeal by Special Leave From Madhya Pradesh High Court
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Occupancy Rights, Usufructuary Mortgage, Restoration of Possession, Tenancy by Insolvency
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gov Ardhan Dass & 8 Ors.
Appellant
Smt. Sitabai
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeals / Supreme Court of India Appeal by Special Leave From Madhya Pradesh High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether mortgagors of 'sir' lands gave up their cultivating rights in favour of the mortgagees under the mortgage deeds of 1895.
- 2 Whether the mortgagee acquired occupancy or ex-proprietary tenancy rights under ss. 12 and 13 of the Central Provinces Tenancy Act, 1920, after purchasing the mortgagors' share in insolvency proceedings and through court decrees.
- 3 Whether transfers effected in execution of decrees or in insolvency proceedings conferred title upon the mortgagee under the relevant tenancy law.
Ratio Decidendi
Transfers of cultivatory rights of occupancy or ex-proprietary tenants through mortgage decrees or insolvency proceedings are void under ss. 12 and 49 of the Central Provinces Tenancy Act, as such transfers require permission of the revenue authority and do not automatically pass in insolvency. Thus, mortgagors (and their survivors) retain occupancy rights regardless of mortgagee's acquisition of proprietary rights by court order.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appellants not entitled to possession in this suit.
- Respondent rightly restored to possession by the revenue authorities.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment