GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH versus P.B. VIJAYAKUMAR AND ANR.
Rule 22-A(2) does not violate Articles 14 or 16; it is a valid special provision for women under Article 15(3), providing limited affirmative action and not reservation in the normal sense. Preference to women to the extent of at least 30% of posts in each category is constitutional, advancing gender equality in public employment.
- Parties
- Appellant: Government of Andhra Pradesh; Respondent: P.B. Vijayakumar; Respondent: Andhra Pradesh State
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed; Rule 22-A(2) upheld as valid.
- Legal Topics
- State and Subordinate Service Rules, Reservation for Women, Interpretation of Articles 15 and 16, Affirmative Action in Employment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Appellant
P.B. Vijayakumar
Respondent
Andhra Pradesh State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Validity of Rule 22-A(2) Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules providing preference to women in public services
- 2 Whether Rule 22-A(2) violates Articles 14 or 16 of the Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
Rule 22-A(2) does not violate Articles 14 or 16; it is a valid special provision for women under Article 15(3), providing limited affirmative action and not reservation in the normal sense. Preference to women to the extent of at least 30% of posts in each category is constitutional, advancing gender equality in public employment.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed; Rule 22-A(2) upheld as valid.
Orders
- Judgment of the High Court striking down second part of Rule 22-A(2) is set aside.
- Rule 22-A(2) Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules is upheld as valid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment