GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL versus TARUN K. ROY AND ORS.

GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL versus TARUN K. ROY AND ORS.

Operators-cum-Mechanics who are not diploma holders in engineering cannot claim pay parity or designation with Sub-Assistant Engineers under the doctrine of 'equal pay for equal work.' Educational qualification is a reasonable basis for classification; as duties and functions are not substantiated as identical, parity in pay scale is not permissible. Relief contrary to statutory rules cannot be granted, and the respondents' claim is barred by delay and laches.

Parties
Appellant: Government of West Bengal; Respondents: Tarun K. Roy and Others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
18 November 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Calcutta High Court Division Bench Judgment Dated 3.12.97 in FMAT No. 1505/1996
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Equal Pay for Equal Work, Reasonable Classification, Delay and Laches, Judicial Discipline, Precedent, Relief Under Article 142
Service Law Constitutional Law Equal Pay for Equal Work Reasonable Classification Delay and Laches Judicial Discipline Precedent Relief Under Article 142

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Government of West Bengal

Appellant

Tarun K. Roy and Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Calcutta High Court Division Bench Judgment Dated 3.12.97 in FMAT No. 1505/1996

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Applicability of the doctrine of 'equal pay for equal work' between Operator-cum-Mechanics and Sub-Assistant Engineers in the West Bengal Irrigation Department
  2. 2 Whether graduates and non-diploma holders can claim parity in pay scales with diploma holders
  3. 3 Grant of relief contrary to statutory rules

Ratio Decidendi

Operators-cum-Mechanics who are not diploma holders in engineering cannot claim pay parity or designation with Sub-Assistant Engineers under the doctrine of 'equal pay for equal work.' Educational qualification is a reasonable basis for classification; as duties and functions are not substantiated as identical, parity in pay scale is not permissible. Relief contrary to statutory rules cannot be granted, and the respondents' claim is barred by delay and laches.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Impugned judgment of Calcutta High Court is set aside
  • Respondents are not entitled to pay parity with Sub-Assistant Engineers