M/S GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD. versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, BOMBAY
Note 1(a) of Chapter 84 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 is clear and unambiguous, excludes 'other articles of Chapter 68,' and does not trigger the ejusdem generis rule because it does not refer to a class, category, or genus followed by general words. Karbate Tubes made of artificial graphite, even though parts of...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Grasim Industries Ltd.; Respondent: Collector of Customs, Bombay
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Classification Under Customs Tariff Act, Interpretation of Exclusion Clauses, Principle of Ejusdem Generis
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Grasim Industries Ltd.
Appellant
Collector of Customs, Bombay
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Karbate Tubes made of artificial graphite impregnated with Phenolic resin, being parts of Heat exchangers, are classifiable under sub-heading 6815.10 or 8419.50 in the First Schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975
- 2 Applicability of the rule of ejusdem generis to the exclusion in Note 1(a) of Chapter 84 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975
Ratio Decidendi
Note 1(a) of Chapter 84 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 is clear and unambiguous, excludes 'other articles of Chapter 68,' and does not trigger the ejusdem generis rule because it does not refer to a class, category, or genus followed by general words. Karbate Tubes made of artificial graphite, even though parts of Heat exchangers, are thus classifiable under sub-heading 6815.10 and not under 8419.50.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment