GUDDU @ SANTOSH versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

GUDDU @ SANTOSH versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Evidence demonstrated attempt to commit rape (Section 376/511 IPC) rather than completed rape; conviction under Section 376/511 was appropriate though High Court erred in sentencing beyond statutory limits for attempted rape.

Parties
Appellant: Guddu @ Santosh; Respondent: State of Madhya Pradesh
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
27 April 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Conviction
Outcome
Appeal partly allowed.
Legal Topics
Attempt to Commit Rape, Rape of a Minor, Corroboration, Medical Evidence
Criminal Law Attempt to Commit Rape Rape of a Minor Corroboration Medical Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Guddu @ Santosh

Appellant

State of Madhya Pradesh

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether conviction under Section 376/511 IPC was proper for alleged sexual assault where hymen was intact
  2. 2 Proper sentencing for attempted rape under Section 376/511 IPC

Ratio Decidendi

Evidence demonstrated attempt to commit rape (Section 376/511 IPC) rather than completed rape; conviction under Section 376/511 was appropriate though High Court erred in sentencing beyond statutory limits for attempted rape.

Court Disposition

Appeal partly allowed.

Orders

  • Sentence reduced from 10 years to 5 years rigorous imprisonment under Section 376/511 IPC.