GURMINDER SINGH KANG versus SHIV PRASAD SINGH & ORS.
The appellant, by canceling time bound promotions granted pursuant to a final High Court order, committed contempt of that order. However, considering his retirement and remorseful conduct, the imprisonment is replaced by a stern warning, while fine is confirmed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Gurminder Singh Kang; Respondent No. 1: Shiv Prasad Singh; Respondents: Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Disposal by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of.
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of High Court Order, Time Bound Promotion, Punishment for Contempt, Service Conditions for Reappointment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gurminder Singh Kang
Appellant
Shiv Prasad Singh
Respondent No. 1
Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Disposal by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant committed contempt of the High Court's order dated 21.08.1995 by canceling time bound promotions of respondent-employee.
- 2 Whether punishment imposed for contempt is warranted in light of appellant's conduct and remorse.
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant, by canceling time bound promotions granted pursuant to a final High Court order, committed contempt of that order. However, considering his retirement and remorseful conduct, the imprisonment is replaced by a stern warning, while fine is confirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of.
Orders
- Simple imprisonment of two months is set aside; a stern warning is recorded against appellant.
- Imposition of fine of Rs.2000/- confirmed, to be paid within four weeks from receipt of order's copy.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment