GURU JAMBHESHWAR UNIVERSITY, HISAR versus DHARAM PAL
For a monthly paid workman, 'average pay' as used in Section 25-F(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is to be calculated as the average wages for the previous three complete calendar months divided by three. The principle of dividing monthly wages by twenty-six working days, which applies under the Payment of Gratuity Act (after statutory amendment), does not apply under the Industrial Disputes Act, since no such amendment has been made. Therefore, the compensation paid by the University was in full compliance with Section 25-F(b).
- Parties
- Appellant: Guru Jambheshwar University, Hisar; Respondent: Dharampal
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Decision on Appeal From High Court Summary Dismissal of Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court Award
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Retrenchment Compensation, Calculation of Average Pay, Industrial Disputes Act Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Guru Jambheshwar University, Hisar
Appellant
Dharampal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Decision on Appeal From High Court Summary Dismissal of Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the principle of dividing monthly wages by 26 for calculation of retrenchment compensation under Section 25-F(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 applies to a monthly-rated workman
- 2 What is the proper method to calculate 'average pay' for retrenchment compensation under Section 25-F(b) for a monthly-paid workman
Ratio Decidendi
For a monthly paid workman, 'average pay' as used in Section 25-F(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is to be calculated as the average wages for the previous three complete calendar months divided by three. The principle of dividing monthly wages by twenty-six working days, which applies under the Payment of Gratuity Act (after statutory amendment), does not apply under the Industrial Disputes Act, since no such amendment has been made. Therefore, the compensation paid by the University was in full compliance with Section 25-F(b).
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- High Court judgment dated 21.3.2005 set aside
- Labour Court award dated 9.11.2004 set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment